Wednesday, March 26, 2014

A letter I wrote to the District.

Hi,
My  question is more "big picture." I have friends in Virginia, where they have a rule that schools must have a technology support person, like an instructional coach for technology. Why, as a district, does DCPS not do more to demand technology education, particularly in the lower grades? As we transition to the PARCC, students are assumed to have a certain level of technology proficiency. While we have been provided with laptops and those typing keyboards, no money or resources have been provided to teach using any of these things. As of right now technology is taught, when a teacher feels like it, if and only if they have the know how to teach technology. I know that occasionally it will fall on the librarian (we currently do not have one, as she quit), which is why all the license questions, we were trying to get a technology teacher but couldn't afford one and were trying to see if we could have someone who is a technology person fill the library slot.  But Library is a subject unto itself, which apparently requires a great level of education to teach. I greatly worry that when PARCC results come out, that they will not reflect the knowledge and hard earned learning by DCPS teachers and students, but will instead reflect the lack of computer proficiency of DCPS students. This is not due to lack of equipment, but lack of instruction. Even if everything fell to the librarian, our specials are 45min. I am guessing that any educator would agree that 45 min a week is not enough time to develop proficiency in any subject, much less two (library and technology). Classroom teachers are reluctant to take on this responsibility for a variety of reasons. First, they feel ill-equipped to do so. They lack the know how to perform many of the computer tasks themselves, must less teach them. Secondly, that is not part of their core curriculum. Without someone in a coaching or teaching type position, teachers so often fail to see that technology education can be seamlessly integrated into their instruction. I don't think that this is an issue that can be tackled on one PD day, or with webenars, or with more "stuff". I think that DCPS should consider adopting a model similar to Virginia's, and fast. Our kids can't afford to fall even more behind their suburban counterparts. I know that you may not be the person to correctly direct my soap box rant, but for right now, you sit in a position to do something about it. I am in the position of Technology Coordinator here at Thomson. I also have a full case load of ESL students, teach an intervention group (of students not on my direct case load), work with Amplify as the POC, and handle our in house tech support, maintain the school website and social media, and have been filling in for a lot of the library work. This half of the year I am also teaching a PLC on integrating technology into the classroom. If you add that up, it is about two to three full time jobs. That is not fair to ask of our teachers. I know I am not the only one.

So the big picture question is what is the Office of Educational Technology, and the district, doing to combat these issues?